This review has mild spoilers. This review is also part of a series of reviews where I review an LGBTQ+ manga/anime once a day. This is Review 2 released on June 2nd 2024. To a certain extent Umibe no tranger is beautiful. In the first minute there is an immediate introduction to detailed environments of different moodsone of a bright family kitchen the other of a dark shrine to a dead relative. The background of each setting is eyecandy with both being filled to the brim with things that characterize both Shun and Mio from the very start. Even before the plot has already started the movie fully shows its own visual capability. And in what immediately follows that allure holds. The islands elegance is portrayed as elegant yet lived in perfectly setting the tone for the story ahead. Even settings outside of the primary island like that of the larger island are detailed to set a different tone showing a different variety of vibrance. The watercolor backgrounds only add to this vibrance with them furthering the immersive experience of the movie. The dialogue does convey many of the surfacelevel plot details but the movie expresses many of its more subconscious emotions through color choices and shot composition. The characters themselves express their own feelings through expressive body language leading to a more dynamic visual journey. However this impression that Umibe no tranger is capable of this type of visual storytelling and glamor leads to greater disappointment as the movie goes on. While its first half is consistently appealing this appeal becomes more sporadic in the movies back half. The color contrast becomes duller destroying a previously established vibrant color palette. The watercolor backgrounds start becoming blurrier with many of its more vibrant details becoming muted. The shot composition turns more generic with much of the visual cinematography becoming far more forgettable. While the visual shorthand for certain emotions stays the same like with the use of corridors to signify openness vs. loneliness and the use of dark and light as symbols for Mio and Shun respectively they arent delivered through the same level of high production. This drop in visual fidelity also affects the story. Since the story was so reliant on the visuals expressing much of its subtext the story doesnt have the same crutch to rely on. This crutch is needed because by itself Umibe no trangers story is nothing too special. From a purely plot standpoint Id even call it a bit boring. I personally never found Shun and Mios relationship to be the most compelling although I would understand why many other people would be invested in it. Their chemistry is present enough to not call it totally unbelievable but not potent enough for any greater personal investment. For nonhomophobes its a largely inoffensive relationship putting aside the whole age gap thing which isnt worth getting into at all. Most of the rest of the story is similarly inoffensive but some questionable hiccups in it are worth discussing. The biggest problem in the first half is how botched the time skip was. Time skips are delicate plot devices as they let the story radically change characters without taking up too much story space but they need a high level of commitment on the narratives part to make it work. This commitment isnt really to the level it should be in Umibe no tranger. With how it is edited I personally didnt even realize there was a time skip until Mio showed up as a radically changed person. None of the other characters in the scene including Shun showed any obvious changes to their character. While the changes to Shun himself are gradually enumerated throughout the movie those changes shouldve been clearer from the very start of the time skip. However these story problems in the first half of the plot are largely irrelevant due to the visual storytelling picking up much of the slack. The sloppy time skip of the first half can be easily put aside because the very first scene past that time skip is beautiful. Yes the narrative aspect might be slumping at this moment but it matters less than it should due to other aspects picking up its weight at this moment. On top of that the romantic relationship of the two main characters becomes more powerful than it should because of this same high level of visual fidelity. And predictably the story problems of the movie become less forgivable when the visual quality starts to fall off. And what was once engaging ends up becoming so unnecessarily tedious. The sex scene in particular might be the strongest example of how much the second halfs generic visual style works against the movie. It is a scene that was strongly built up to but I found it to be very boring. A reasonable expectation for a movie that has shown the ability to create strong visual language is that there is a capability to creatively work a scene to extenuate emotions not originally expected from it. But given the visual quality of the second half taken in full it isnt surprising that the scene doesnt come off as anything remotely unique. When I was watching that I ended up focusing more on the piano and violin being used as music. While these instruments suited the intended elegance of the rest of the movie they were severely out of place in this scene. Most of the rest of the second half follows suit in this way. It is unremarkable with less allure and less style. It isnt exactly worth giving a blowbyblow of this section of the film because it all boils down to Im disappointed with how boringly this was conveyed. Even if the sex scene was the most notable example of it this same mantra still applies for the rest of the back half even with occasional sparks of brilliance in the flashbacks. And to say that is deeply unfortunate due to how much the first half of the movie prided itself on how artful it was. However the final impression of this movie ends up being far more mixed and at times bitter. It shouldnt have been something that was running so strongly in its opening act and started to slowly collapse due to the fleeting nature of its initial strength. But thats how it all turned out very very disappointingly. Thank you for reading to the end of the review if you did. If you have any criticisms of how this review was made you are free to message me to critique what I had to say. Also please dont like or dislike the review without reading it.
57 /100
17 out of 19 users liked this review